Who Is Murder of Huang Na? Age, Biography and Wiki
Huang Na was born on September 26, 1996, in Singapore. Tragically, her life was cut short on November 10, 2004, when she was kidnapped and murdered, an event that shook the nation and garnered significant media attention. As of 2025, Huang Na's memory lives on, with her story reminding us of the pressing need for child safety and awareness.
| Occupation | Other |
|---|---|
| Date of Birth | September 26, 1996 |
| Age | 8 Years |
| Birth Place | Putian, Fujian, China |
| Horoscope | Libra |
| Country | Singapore |
| Date of death | 10 October, 2004 |
| Died Place | Pasir Panjang, Queenstown, Singapore |
Popularity
Murder of Huang Na's Popularity over time
Height, Weight & Measurements
While precise details regarding Huang Na's height, weight, and measurements are not widely documented, anecdotal reports suggest she was a typical nine-year-old in stature. The focus remains on her legacy rather than physical attributes, as her horrific fate is a chilling reminder of the vulnerability of children.
Family, Dating & Relationship Status
Huang Na was the daughter of Huang Yik Mei and Huang Hoi Fong. Her family experienced immense grief following her tragic murder. At the time of her death, she was too young to be involved in romantic relationships, and details of familial interactions before the incident are primarily centered around the pursuit of justice for her untimely demise. The murder case revealed the depths of a parent's love and the lengths they will go to for their child's safety.
Huang Na (26 September 1996 – 10 October 2004) was an eight-year-old Chinese national residing in Pasir Panjang, Singapore, who disappeared on 10 October 2004. Her mother, the police and the community conducted a three-week-long nationwide search for her.
After her body was found, many Singaporeans attended her wake and funeral, giving bai jin (contributions towards funeral expenses) and gifts.
In a high-profile 14-day trial, Malaysian-born Took Leng How, a vegetable packer at the wholesale centre, was found guilty of murdering her and hanged after an appeal and a request for presidential clemency failed.
Net Worth and Salary
Given that Huang Na was a child at the time of her death, she had no recorded net worth or salary. However, the aftermath of her murder led to significant public discussions and changes in both legal protocols concerning child safety and awareness campaigns in Singapore.
Career, Business and Investments
As a young child, Huang Na did not have a career or business ventures. Her life was devoted to her childhood education and play. However, her tragic story has inspired various community-focused initiatives aimed at improving child welfare and safety in Singapore, thus creating a different kind of legacy that promotes awareness and education regarding child protection.
Huang Na went missing on 10 October 2004, last being seen at a food court near the wholesale centre. She was wearing a blue denim jacket, bermuda shorts, and was barefoot. From 7 a.m. to past midnight every day for three weeks, Shuying looked across the island for her daughter.
The police, including a Criminal Investigation Department team, conducted an intensive search for the girl, and officers carried photographs of her while on their daily rounds.
Volunteers formed search parties and Crime Library Singapore, a voluntary group dedicated to finding missing persons, distributed over 70,000 leaflets appealing for information. Local taxi company ComfortDelGro asked its cabbies to join in the search effort.
Social Network
While Huang Na did not have social media accounts or networks—given her age at the time of her death—the case has sparked numerous conversations on social media platforms and forums concerning child safety, the importance of protective measures, and the psychological impacts on families affected by similar tragedies. The community's engagement remains a testament to the need for a united front in ensuring child safety.
The defence relied on the claim of diminished responsibility. Psychiatrist R. Nagulendran argued that Took was schizophrenic, as some of his behaviour, such as frequently smiling to himself and talking of spirits, was inappropriate, and that he had no motive for the murder.
Nagulendran also called Took's story about the three Chinese men a delusion. Anandan said that during his conversations with Took, the defendant would frequently start ranting about irrelevant things the lawyer could not understand. This resulted in his decision to keep Took from taking the stand.
Instead, he allowed a psychiatrist to testify on Took’s behalf. Took’s police statements contained numerous discrepancies from the many different accounts of what happened to Huang Na. Took's low IQ of 76 was also noted by his defence. However, the prosecution's psychiatrist, G.
Sathyadevan, insisted that Took did not suffer from any abnormality of mind.
Education
At the time of her murder, Huang Na was a student in Singapore, attending primary school. Tragically, her education was cut short due to her untimely death. In the wake of this tragedy, educational initiatives focusing on children’s rights and safety have emerged, promoting a safer environment for children across Singapore.
In May 2003, Shuying immigrated to Singapore as a peidu mama accompanying Huang Na, who was enrolled in Jin Tai Primary School. They lived at the Pasir Panjang Wholesale Centre, where Shuying worked. People from the wholesale centre and Jin Tai Primary School described Huang Na as an intelligent, independent, sociable and active child.
Huang Na became friends with Took Leng How, a vegetable packer at the wholesale centre. Born in Malaysia on 16 December 1981 as the second child of a close-knit family of four, Took came to Singapore when he was 18, seeking better-paying jobs.
At the wholesale centre, Took, who married an Indonesian Chinese woman and had a son, often played with Huang Na, bought her food and gave her rides on his motorcycle.
Conclusion
The murder of Huang Na remains a pivotal moment in Singapore's history, serving as a critical reminder of the importance of child safety and the need for supportive family structures. While her life ended tragically, her legacy motivates a continued focus on community actions, child protection reforms, and the relentless pursuit of justice.
As we honor her memory, it is paramount that society remains vigilant in safeguarding the innocent and ensuring that families are supported in their roles as protectors of the young.
