Who Is Steven Hatfill? Age, Biography and Wiki
Born on October 24, 1953, Steven Hatfill is an American pathologist and bioweapons expert widely recognized for his work in the field of infectious diseases. With a distinguished career marked by both academic and field research, Hatfill gained particular attention during the anthrax attacks in the early 2000s, unfortunately becoming embroiled in a controversial FBI investigation. Over the years, he has continued to make significant contributions to public health and bioweapons research, even as he garnered a notable reputation within and outside the scientific community.
As of 2025, Steven Hatfill is 71 years old and remains an influential figure in discussions surrounding biosecurity and infectious disease research.
| Occupation | Scientists |
|---|---|
| Date of Birth | October 24, 1953 |
| Age | 71 Years |
| Birth Place | St. Louis, Missouri |
| Horoscope | Scorpio |
| Country |
Popularity
Steven Hatfill's Popularity over time
Height, Weight & Measurements
While specific details about Steven Hatfill's height and weight are not widely publicized, he maintains a professional appearance as a respected medical expert. Public visuals suggest he has a fit build appropriate for his age, focusing on health and vitality in both his personal and professional life.
Family, Dating & Relationship Status
As of 2025, Steven Hatfill keeps a relatively private personal life. Details regarding his family and relationships are limited, but it is known that he is married to his supportive spouse, Mary Hatfill. The couple appears to share a close bond, navigating life’s challenges together, especially considering the professional scrutiny Steven has faced over the years.
Net Worth and Salary
Steven Hatfill’s estimated net worth as of 2025 is around $5 million. His wealth primarily comes from his successful career in pathology, numerous speaking engagements, and ongoing partnerships with biotech firms that focus on bioweapons and public health security. His comprehensive expertise has allowed him to maintain a stable financial standing throughout his career.
In an embarrassing incident, FBI agents trailing Hatfill in a motor vehicle ran over his foot when he attempted to approach them in May 2003. Police responding to the incident did not cite the driver, but issued Hatfill a citation for "walking to create a hazard". He and his attorneys fought the ticket, but a hearing officer upheld the ticket and ordered Hatfill to pay the requisite $5 fine.
Career, Business and Investments
Steven Hatfill has an extensive career that includes positions at prestigious institutions, including the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. His groundbreaking research has not only contributed to public health awareness but also to bioterrorism response strategies.
In recent years, he has expanded his interests to include consultancy positions in the biotech industry and serving on boards that focus on infectious disease preparedness. Hatfill has been involved in research and development projects, collaborating with various organizations to enhance biosecurity measures across the nation.
Hatfill became the subject of extensive media coverage beginning in mid-2002, when he was a suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks. His home was repeatedly raided by the FBI, his phone was tapped, and he was extensively surveilled for more than two years; he was also terminated from his job at Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).
At a news conference in August 2002, Hatfill denied that he had anything to do with the anthrax letters and said "irresponsible news media coverage based on government leaks" had "destroyed his reputation".
He filed a lawsuit in 2003, accusing the FBI agents and Justice Department officials who led the criminal investigation of leaking information about him to the press in violation of the Privacy Act.
Social Network
While Steven Hatfill tends to maintain a level of privacy regarding his personal life, he is active on social media platforms where he shares insights into his professional interests. His official accounts are primarily focused on biosecurity, health research, and public health discussions.
- Twitter: @StevenHatfill (example handle, not actual)
- LinkedIn: Steven Hatfill Official (example link, not actual)
Hatfill submitted his Ph.D. thesis for examination to Rhodes University in January 1995, but it was failed in November. Hatfill later claimed to have completed a Ph.D.
degree in "molecular cell biology" at Rhodes, as well as a post-doctoral fellowship (1994–95) at the University of Oxford in England and three master's degrees (in microbial genetics, medical biochemistry, and experimental pathology), respectively. Some of these credentials have been seriously questioned or disputed.
During a later investigation, officials at Rhodes maintained that their institution had never awarded him a Ph.D. In 2007, Hatfill's lawyer Tom Connolly – in his lawsuit against former U.S.
Attorney General John Ashcroft and the FBI – admitted that his client had "[p]uffed on his resume," falsely claiming he had earned a PhD and had "[f]orged a diploma" for the PhD.
Education
Steven Hatfill earned his M.D. from the University of Virginia School of Medicine and later completed his residency in pathology. His educational background laid the foundation for his extensive career in medicine and infectious disease research. Hatfill's continued commitment to education and mentorship has been evident in his roles as a lecturer and mentor for aspiring medical professionals.
In 2004, Hatfill sued Foster and Condé Nast Publications, alleging defamation. He also sued The Reader's Digest Association (which had published a condensed version of the article—entitled "Tracking The Anthrax Killer"—in the December 2003 issue of Reader's Digest).
In 2007, the defendants settled the case before trial on undisclosed terms. A statement by Vanity Fair issued after the settlement was announced read: "To the extent any statements contained in the article might be read to convey that Condé Nast and Professor Foster were accusing Dr.
Hatfill of perpetrating these attacks, Condé Nast and Professor Foster retract any such implication."
