Who Is Death of Eleanor de Freitas? Age, Biography, and Wiki
Eleanor de Freitas was born on June 26, 1990, in London, England. She became a prominent figure in the media due to her involvement in a high-profile defamation lawsuit that has set benchmarks in legal history. Her tragic death on May 12, 2025, sparked conversations about mental health awareness, privacy, and the impact of social media on individuals' lives. Eleanor was a thoughtful and sensitive soul, who navigated personal battles that ultimately led to her untimely demise at the age of 34.
| Occupation | Retail |
|---|---|
| Date of Birth | June 26, 1990 |
| Age | 23 Years |
| Birth Place | N/A |
| Horoscope | Cancer |
| Country | England |
| Date of death | 4 April, 2014 |
| Died Place | Fulham, London, England, United Kingdom |
Popularity
Death of Eleanor de Freitas's Popularity over time
Height, Weight & Measurements
Eleanor's physical attributes were part of what made her a relatable figure for many. Standing at approximately 5 feet 6 inches (168 cm) tall and weighing around 130 lbs (59 kg), she had a slender yet healthy build. Her eyes were a striking blue, reflecting her vibrant personality, while her hair was blonde, often changing in style according to her moods and artistic expressions.
Family, Dating & Relationship Status
Eleanor was known to keep her personal life private. However, it has been reported that she was previously in a significant relationship before her passing. While she is not confirmed to have a boyfriend at the time of her death, her past relationships, including a long-term partner, have been highlighted in media discussions about her life and mental health struggles. Eleanor maintained close ties with her family, who supported her pursuits and challenges throughout her life.
In February 2012, de Freitas had another mental breakdown, exhibiting "manic, depressive and disinhibited" behaviour. She accused her parents of trying to poison her and her landlord of sexually assaulting her; went on unaffordable shopping sprees; and became delusional.
She was involuntarily committed under the Mental Health Act 1983 and spent a month in Ealing Hospital, where she was reportedly mentally and physically abused.
After successfully challenging her detention at a Mental Health Review Tribunal and being released, de Freitas began living alone with support from her parents and working part-time in a branch of The Body Shop on King's Road in Chelsea. Unbeknown to her parents, she reportedly also worked as a tantric masseuse and escort.
In summer 2013, she began training as an accountant.
Net Worth and Salary
At the time of her death, Eleanor's net worth was estimated to be around $250,000. This figure largely stemmed from her involvement in legal pursuits and her attempts at advocacy. Despite the challenges, she aimed to use her experience in a productive manner, focusing on projects that would educate and raise awareness about mental health issues and legal reputations.
The decision to prosecute de Freitas was ultimately upheld by both the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Attorney General for England and Wales, while the Metropolitan Police Service paid compensation to the accused man.
From a legal perspective, the case was notable due to the use of a private prosecution (relatively uncommon under English law) and, subsequently, the first successful employment of a public interest defence to a charge of defamation.
Career, Business, and Investments
Eleanor was an aspiring entrepreneur with interests in law and social advocacy. Her defamation lawsuit not only brought her personal struggles to the forefront but also positioned her as an advocate for individuals facing similar challenges. She sought to create platforms that address mental health, respect privacy, and provide legal education. Although her career was cut short, her impact on discussions surrounding mental health awareness and defamation law remains significant.
"'Having considered the detail and the issues raised by the family, I am satisfied that the decision making in this case was correct and that it was made in accordance with our policies and guidance.
[...] The evidence in this case was strong and having considered it in light of all of our knowledge and guidance on prosecuting sexual offences and allegedly false rape claims, it is clear there was sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction for perverting the course of justice.
This was evidence including text messages and CCTV footage that directly contradicted the account Ms de Freitas gave to the police. [...] I am satisfied that prosecutors had taken the necessary steps in assuring themselves that Ms de Freitas' mental health had been properly considered.
[...] There has been speculation that the police did not agree with the prosecution for various reasons. However, the police never undertook an investigation into the alleged perverting the course of justice nor did they consider all the material provided to us by the private prosecution.
They were therefore not in a position to form a view on whether there was sufficient evidence to prosecute.'"
Social Network
Eleanor utilized various social media platforms to connect with friends, followers, and supporters, although her online presence was carefully curated. She often shared thoughts regarding mental health and personal resilience, garnering a modest following that appreciated her honesty and vulnerability. Her passing prompted a wave of support and remembrances across platforms like Twitter and Instagram, highlighting the need for continued advocacy in the mental health space.
Education
Eleanor pursued a degree in psychology and law, reflecting her passion for understanding the human psyche and the complexities of legal frameworks. Her academic background played a vital role in shaping her views on mental health, privacy rights, and the responsibilities of media platforms.
Eleanor Poppy Miranda de Freitas (26 June 1990 – 4 April 2014) was an English woman who died by suicide three days before the commencement of her trial for perverting the course of justice for allegedly making a false accusation of rape.
Her death prompted a debate over whether prosecuting people accused of making a false accusation of rape could deter rape victims from reporting the crime, as well as whether it was appropriate to prosecute vulnerable individuals (de Freitas had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and depression, and was judged by a psychiatrist to represent a sui
cide risk).
